Compliance vs. Operational Health: Why ISO27001 Certification Isn't the Whole Story

Compliance, like ISO27001, shows you meet standards—but it doesn’t mean you're thriving. True success is a healthy, effective technology function that delivers value.I have lost count of how many times I have heard the line: 'We must be good because we have ISO27001 certification.' (Feel free to swap ISO27001 for any other framework or certification.)

‍

Here’s the short answer: “No, this means you are compliant, not necessarily good.”

‍

There’s a big difference. Compliance is about meeting a standard, a set of minimum requirements. Operational health, on the other hand, is about having a functional, thriving, and resilient technology function. It is about more than just conforming to a framework—it is about delivering value effectively and consistently.

‍

Let me be clear: I am a strong advocate for ISO27001 and similar standards. I have successfully led projects to implement them and seen first-hand how they can establish crucial foundations for security and process management. However, it is equally important to recognise that compliance does not automatically equate to excellence.

‍

At StackUp, we take a different approach. We do not just check boxes—we dig deeper. We examine how well your technology function is actually operating. Because ticking a box does not mean that your systems are robust, your processes are streamlined, or that your people are empowered to succeed.

‍

Compliance is important, but a healthy, effective technology function matters even more. Your customers, partners, and employees—everyone relying on the services your technology provides—will notice the difference between a compliant system and a truly operational one.

‍

So yes, celebrate your ISO27001 certification, but remember - it is a starting point, not the finish line. Operational health is the ultimate goal, and that is where the real impact lies. At StackUp, we are here to help you achieve it.

‍